Burn & Company commercial practice logo Menu element
Blank spacing image
 
    OUR SERVICES >
 
Bullet point icon

Commercial Agreements

  - Contracts / Terms of Business
  - Commercial Bulletins
 
Bullet point icon

Commercial Property

- Sale & Purchase
- Leases
- Investment Property
  - Commercial Property Bulletins
   
Bullet point icon

Employment Law

- Recruitment Policies
- Discrimination
- Contracts of Employment
  - Rights during Employment
- Restraint on competition
  - Confidentiality
  - Employment Tribunal claims
  - Policies and Procedures
  - Employment Bulletins
 
Bullet point icon

Alternative Dispute Resolution

  - The Mediation Process
  - The Mediator's Role
   
Bullet point icon

Insurance Companies

   
Bullet point icon

Dental Profession

  - Dental Profession Bulletins
 
Bullet point icon

Services to Charities

   
Bullet point icon

General News

   
Bullet point icon

Private Client web site

 
 
    FREE NEWSLETTER >
Subscribe to our free e-newsletter for the latest legal news and views:
Name :   
Email :    
 
Web Pages   Bulletins 
Home >

Bullet point icon  Landlord must pay damages to tenant for wrongful eviction

 Published : 17/05/2010    |   View more Commercial Property Bulletins

A landlord who repossessed and sold a property while the tenant was in prison has been ordered to pay damages for wrongful eviction.

It’s an unusual case but a timely reminder of the dangers of taking the law into your own hands.

The landlord first re-entered the property and changed the locks while the tenant was away from home. The tenant returned and was able to gain entry, but shortly afterwards he was sentenced to a term in prison.

The landlord then entered the property again and sold it with vacant possession.

The tenant sought damages for wrongful eviction under the Housing Act 1988 on the basis that the landlord had wrongfully deprived him of the occupation of the premises.

The landlord put forward the defence that he believed that the tenant had abandoned the property and surrendered the tenancy. He submitted a counter claim to recover rent arrears.

The judge held that the tenant had not abandoned the premises and that the landlord had taken a calculated risk in re-entering and changing the locks. He had no reasonable grounds for believing that the tenant was no longer at the premises.

That decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal which agreed that the tenant had not done anything that could amount to a surrender of the tenancy.

The case highlights the need for landlords to seek legal advice when faced with situations like this. In order to mount a successful defence, the landlord would have to be able to prove that he believed, and that it was reasonable to believe, that the property had been abandoned.

If he is unable to do this then he is likely to be found liable for wrongful eviction. A more certain approach would be to seek a possession order.

Please contact us if you would like more information about landlord and tenant issues.



Bookmark and Share

Related links:
No links from this page.

 


 

 
SFLA, Community Legal Services, Investors in People
 Find Solicitor | QualitySolicitors.comBurn & Company Solicitors, Lendal House, 11 Lendal, York, YO1 8AQ. | Tel: (01904) 655442 | Email: enquiries@burn-company.co.uk
Burn & Company Solicitors, Rowntree House, Market Place, Easingwold, York, YO61 3AG | Tel: (01347) 822188
Burn & Company is the trading name of Yorklaw Limited. Company registration number 3406481. Registered office: Lendal House York YO18AQ.
A list of the Directors of Yorklaw Limited is open to inspection at the registered office. VAT Registration No: 349 4472 27.
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA No: 519074